Designed & built by Nisarg Thunga
JCtrans · the network we already belong to

The JCtrans network

Every public JCtrans company profile, read from their own sitemap. No email addresses — this is a pool to fish from, never a send list.

Las Vegas — the must-meet twelve
The attendee list went live on 9 Aug. Every registration, tiered exactly as the Rome 118 were — lane size drives, whitespace multiplies, booth-holders outrank registrants. The ask column is ready to paste into JCtrans's meeting scheduler.
#CompanyWhereOn the floor Why this meetingThe ask, ready to send

The target is the same as Rome: all of Tier A plus the best of Tier B = 20 booked one-to-ones, requested through JCtrans's own scheduler the moment booking opens for us — it runs to 9 September and fills first-come.

Everyone registered
The whole room, ranked.
TierCompanyWhereOn the floor GCC laneAlready ours?Why

Tier X is WorldZone's own footprint — the GCC six and India are peers in the room, not partner targets, and two of them are WorldZone's own registrations (Saudi and UAE). There are no email addresses on this list; meetings go through JCtrans's scheduler. "FMC-licensed" is matched only against the Houston, Boston and Denver registries already on file — a row without a licence shown is unchecked, not unlicensed. GCC lane = polymer + dates demand in the attendee's country.

Las Vegas — the working list
JCtrans members who also hold an FMC licence. A verified city, a licence number and a named human on every row — the only US rows where that is true.
CompanyCityContact FMC licenceReachMatched on

Short on purpose. JCtrans's US records are trustworthy at country level — only 2 of 1,365 carry a non-US legal form — but not at city level: 547 sit in a dumping ground, and one reads "San Francisco" over a Sacramento address. Never sort or filter the US list by JCtrans's own city. These rows borrow their city from the FMC registry instead.

Already ours
Members of this network who are already on our books.
JCtrans profileCountryOn our books as Matched on
Where the network is, and we are not
Countries carrying real GCC polymer demand where WorldZone has no partner — and how many JCtrans members sit there. We are a member of this network, so these are not cold countries. The six GCC states and India are left out: an absent overseas partner at the origin is not a gap.
CountryRegion GCC laneOur partners On fileJCtrans members With a website
Browse the network
Queried on the server, a page at a time — the whole table is never sent to the browser.
CompanyWhereWebsite ServicesSizeFounded
What this data is, and what it is not
Stands up
  • The company name and the country. Country is right even where the city is not — in the US only 2 of 1,365 records carry a non-US legal form.
  • The street address, on — of them.
  • The website, where there is one — — carry one, re-derived from the raw value rather than the scraper's guess.
Does not
  • The city, on — records. JCtrans files unrelated firms under one place — 707 in Fayetteville, 275 in "Alofi, Niue". Those cities are blanked here and the original is kept in city_raw.
  • Services and trade lanes. Only — profiles declare them — that is the real fill rate, not a parser fault. Useful as a filter, useless as a census.
  • There are no email addresses here at all. That is structural: this table is separate from agents so nothing in it can ever reach the outreach list.